Centro to meet Secretary of State to win better funding deal for Midland rail projects

Listen to this article

Centro bosses are to meet with Transport Secretary Justine Greening in a bid to win a better funding deal for rail projects in the West Midlands.

Centro, the region’s transport authority, is keen to discuss the level of investment for the West Midlands rail network between 2014 and 2019 proposed under the Initial Industry Plan (IIP).

Chief executive Geoff Inskip told members of the Integrated Transport Authority considering its response to the IIP that he had written to MPs about the “paucity” of the plans.

Dudley North MP Ian Austin raised the issue in parliament and prompted the meeting with Ms Greening.

A formal date for the meeting has yet to be finalised but the controversial proposals would see the Midlands receive investment of just £57 million out of a total proposed budget of around £10 billion.

The IIP has been drawn up by the Office of Rail Regulation, Network Rail, the Association of Train Operating Companies, the Rail Freight Operators Association, and the Rail Industry Association and represents the industry’s view of funding priorities.

Although not binding on the Government, it is influential when ministers decide funding.

Under the proposals the lion’s share goes to London and the South East, which gets between £349.5 million and £389.4 million (40%) depending on total costs.

Eight schemes identified by Centro as priorities for the five year period, known as CP5, would be extremely unlikely to get off the ground in that time.

Mr Inskip said Centro believed the IIP did not adequately address the jobs and regeneration needs of the region.

They also failed to link in with Government thinking on the proposed high-speed rail link between Birmingham and London.

He said: “Centro is extremely disappointed that the IIP proposes little to support the continued growth in both the passenger and rail freight sectors in the West Midlands.

“There should be a much wider package of infrastructure investment around the region in order to improve accessibility to both labour and goods markets, stimulating economic growth, job creation and increasing local and national productivity.

“We are asking the Secretary of State to consider the IIP and tell the rail industry that they should rethink these proposals and give far more emphasis to jobs and regeneration.”

The eight local rail schemes Centro wants to see completed or work begin on in CP5 are:

  • Re-opening of the line between Walsall and Stourbridge
  • The Camp Hill Chords scheme introducing services from Moor Street in Birmingham to Kings Norton and Water Orton
  • Electrification of the Walsall to Rugeley line
  • Reinstatement of a fourth platform at Snow Hill station and the Rowley Regis Turnback
  • Increasing the speed on lines between Walsall and Rugeley, Wolverhampton and Shrewsbury, Coventry and Nuneaton
  • Resignalling and remodelling the track in the Worcester area
  • Improving capacity between Birmingham and Coventry
  • Station enhancements at Walsall, Coventry, Wolverhampton, Solihull and Birmingham International.

The only regional schemes in the Midlands the IIP proposals say should go ahead are capacity enhancements at Water Orton and between Leamington and Coventry.

Centro recently commissioned a study from KPMG which looks set to demonstrate that such a programme of regional rail enhancements would increase economic productivity in the West Midlands by more than £400 million.

No decisions have been taken by the Government on the IIP proposals and Mr Inskip said Centro would continue to press the case for regional investment in the West Midlands.

2 COMMENTS

  1. The
    KPMG report commissioned by Centro (from which the oft quoted but highly misleading
    ’40,000 jobs for the West Midlands’ claim comes), is predicated on a huge (and
    very expensive) package of local rail improvements to integrate with HS2. Based
    on this report the chances of local rail investment at this level are zero.  

     

    If
    you discount this and other improbable assumptions contained in the report you
    get 5000 jobs (and this is gross – no account of jobs relocated from WM to London and South East).

     

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Rail News

ORR review leads to 50% reduction in maximum fees for ticket refunds

New rules will mean that from 2 April the maximum fee that train operators and ticket retailers can charge...

More like this...